Full Comparison. Fuji GFX 50R/S vs Hasselblad X1D i have both the fuji 50 and the x1d, i consider them totally different although they have the same sensor. This could be good for someone who is starting out in photography, but come on – this is a medium format camera! 44 x 33mm vs 43.8 x … As you can see, X1D is 3 years older than GFX 100. Fujifilm GFX 50S Shop now at Amazon. Jay P. Morgan compares the Fujifilm GFX 50R with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and while they're alike in a number of ways many people's biggest grievance will be the price brackets. 6.33 in. Just a quick FYI – both systems use focus-by-wire method of focusing. In our brief time with it at Photokina, the camera definitely felt slower when acquiring focus (sometimes it took more than a second) but what we saw back then was a pre-production model so we can’t really come to any definite conclusion. The difference is huge – we are talking about 1/2000th of a second sync speed vs 1/125th of a second. By default, the only thing you can do in live view mode is tap on an area of the screen twice to zoom into it instantly (if you hold and press the “AF / MF” button, only then you can use your finger on the touchscreen to select a focus point). While Hasselblad delivered the smallest and the lightest medium format camera ever made in the shape of the X1D-50c, Fuji definitely surprised many of us with the low (for medium format) price of the GFX 50S. These profiles include the most popular such as Astia, Classic Chrome and ACROS. Find out where the GFX 50S wins! This happens even if I don’t move any sliders. It seems like Hasselblad put quite a bit of effort into the design of the camera and it really shows. This gives you the advantage of a faster mechanical speed (1/4000s) and an even faster electronic shutter speed as seen above. If there are other things people are curious about, let me know. Sort: Clear All. Live Chat. Fuji already has quite a bit of mirrorless experience under its belt, with cameras used by the masses, and it really shows. Could you just name one? German FineArtPrinter magazine organised a workshop for testing and comparing the Fuji GXF 50S and the Hasselblad X1D. I was wondering if you know If the difference in price between H an X lenses is: – due to increased sharpness, lower CA and/or better bokeh on H; – due to manufacturing price; is it just cheaper to produce lenses for X system? The GFX 50R is less expensive. But output images (exported) from it are terribly underexposed. has better menus, better ergonomics, leaf shutter lenses and the 80mm f … I don’t think Hasselblad wants to compete with its own main system. My biggest concern is investing in a rig, only to find it discarded a few years later into the Obsolete bin. DXOMARK Sensor Scores: Overall Score . Both the GFX 50R and the X1D II are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are equipped with a medium format sensor. On paper, one might say the Fuji trumps the Hasselblad. Nasim, I tried the free image editing software Phocus 3.3 from Hasselblad today. In fact, even after updating the camera to the latest firmware, I could not figure out how to change the focus point on my own – I had to resort to an online manual. Hasselblad X1D images have the same problem -- deep shadows are "smudged" to black, even with 100 Shadow Fill in Phocus processing. The two cameras differ quite a bit when it comes to handling, ergonomics and weight. So if I dial something like +1 on the touchscreen, then before taking a picture decide to change the compensation to -1 using the rear dial, as soon as I take a picture, my override resets itself back to the +1 setting. The Fuji has WAY more features, and it’s cheaper. This is a very bad design and something Hasselblad should address – why are there two exposure compensation functions (Exposure Compensation + Exposure Quick Adjust) and why are they not in sync? What about the Fuji GFX 50S, you might ask? It almost feels like Hasselblad used a very old and slow processor that cannot keep up with the camera. If you're wondering what medium format is, or if you've been wondering whether maybe medium format is something that you could use, I've got an entire course on medium format photography that will mostly answer all of those questions for you. Scores; Specifications; Measurements; Lenses tested; Fujifilm GFX 50S. 2 editorial reviews. with all respect, could you list other medium format that you have worked with? When shooting with the GFX 50S and the X1D-50c in a studio setting, the background on the X1D-50c at the same aperture looked more stopped down, with more things appearing in focus. Fujifilm GFX 50R. Interestingly, this also affects depth of field. Comparison of Fujifilm GFX 50R and Hasselblad X1D-50c based on specifications, reviews and ratings. The monitor is slightly larger (3.2″) and can be adjusted in three directions: up, down and to the side (like the X-T2). It is clear that Fujifilm wants to launch a complete professional system that can challenge not only the most obvious competitor (X1D) but also all the other medium format systems out there, including the more expensive ones such as the H series from Hasselblad and Phase one. The Hasselblad is slimmer and lighter by approximately 200g (725g vs the 920g of the GFX with EVF). The X1D definitely has an appealing design but I do wonder who its target user is. It will be interesting to see how Fujifilm optimised the profiles for the 50S Bayer sensor and how much more accurate the colour rendering will be in comparison to the X series. On the GFX, the rear monitor is also touch sensitive and can be used to select a focus point, swipe through the images in playback mode or select an option in the Q menu. The sensors are pretty darn close to be ISO-invariant, which is great news! In my opinion good minimal designs are easier to use and therefore more functional. Those buttons do not have any labels on them – instead, all you see is icons like playback, rectangle, star, an “x” and three striped lines. Impressions on Fuji GFX and Phase ONE 11:20 am, March 26, 2017. 57. points. So which one is better, leaf shutter or focal plane shutter? Hasselblad offers an adapter for H lenses, a good idea, in my opinion. I find your review very useful and well written please keep doing this. I tested both cameras at low and high ISOs, then even performed basic ISO invariance tests, underexposing all the way to 5 stops and then recovering in post to see if there were any drastic differences between the two. By contrast, the X1D has a native ISO range of 100 to 25600. Build quality of lenses seem to be very solid, but the focusing on the Hasselblad lenses is pretty darn loud when compared to Fuji lenses. One of my biggest frustrations when using the Hasselblad X1D-50c has been its blackouts and lags. Lag is an issue I find annoying with the Leica too, so this may also sway me. Now, Fujifilm is using its years of experience with medium format film and lenses as a springboard for the new GFX mirrorless system, opening up a new market for enthusiasts and professionals who, just a few years before, could only dream of owning a compact digital medium format system. I recently had the chance to test the new Fuji GFX 50S. The X1D is definitely more expensive at $8,995 for body alone and $2295 for the 45mm f/3.5 (for a total of $11290). It has been designed to deliver the most natural results possible with a dedicated algorithm calibrated on the camera’s sensor. The ability to fire off camera (‘Bad) flash beyond 1/250th is a real bonus though. On the X1D-50c, the shutter is located inside the lens, so the front of the sensor is free from a mechanical shutter. Let’s take a look at ISO 100, underexposed by 5 stops and then recovered in post (Left: Fuji GFX 50S, Right: Hasselblad X1D-50c, click to enlarge): In essence, you are looking at ISO 3200 here. 3.8 in. During our brief encounter at Photokina, we found the shutter sound pleasant and discreet. Note: the code above is invalidwhen the software is on pre-order. For better AF experience, he recommends to switch to manual focus and use the rear AF-D button for focusing instead (back-button focusing), which definitely makes a difference. 67. points. Fujifilm will also release the H Mount Adapter G to allow you to use the Super EBC Fujinon HC lenses on the GFX (which are made by Fujifilm by the way!). I have been fortunate to have had my hands on these two cameras for the past few weeks and although I am planning to put the two cameras to real use very soon, I have already gathered some thoughts that I would like to share with our readers. The number of focus points is largely irrelevant as is the face detection gimmick, as you say, the camera system has been the mainstay of thousands of working professionals over the years so not having such a feature is not relevant. This needs to be addressed. Concerning the autofocus system, both cameras use a contrast detection system but the GFX seems to have a more advanced configuration. Let’s take a look at the two medium format cameras in more detail and compare them side by side. amzn_assoc_linkid = "9a1cb4319776d63bf4f1b7ffe64e26d4"; But if the heart is the same, there are many other differences between these two products, starting with the philosophy behind them. Image; Fujifilm GFX 50R Hasselblad X1D-50c; ISO minimum: 50. amzn_assoc_search_bar = "false"; The X1D has a fixed 2.36 MP electronic viewfinder whose position is at the top-centre of the camera. Focus speed is not bad, but if you are used to the insanely fast AF of a DSLR, or the latest generation mirrorless cameras, you will be disappointed. It seems like Fuji simply reused the same dials on the GFX 50S as on cameras like the X-T2, which is a bit odd, as the GFX 50S is a much larger camera in comparison. The shooting mode dial can be locked (just press it and press it again to unlock it) and features three custom modes. Portrait (Color Depth) 0 bits. No items to compare. The articulated screen and the viewfinder on the Fuli are superior to the ‘Blad. There are only 2 cameras that are compact mirrorless digital medium format, these are the Hasselblad X1D and the Fujifilm GFX 50R. Aravind Krishnaswamy | Hasselblad X1D vs. Fuji GFX Feel free to throw questions or thoughts here. The X1D was announced with three lenses. Fujifilm GFX 50S Roundup: Fuji GFX 50S vs Hasselblad X1D-50c, Lens Reviews, Editorials, And More ; Sony Published New Sensor Information Including The Fujifilm GFX100S IMX461 Sensor ; Fujifilm GFX50R vs Fujifilm GFX50S vs Hasselblad X1D: Photons to Photos PDR Comparison Nasim Mansurov is the author and founder of Photography Life, based out of Denver, Colorado. Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Hasselblad X1D The Fujifilm GFX 100 and the Hasselblad X1D-50c are two professional cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in May 2019 and June 2016. It turns out that one has to hold and press the “AF / MF” button on top of the camera in order to bring up the focus points. Let me show you what I mean. Thank you Nasim for a very nice review. The 90mm costs $2695 but there isn’t a price for the 30mm yet. The shutter opens and closes like an iris diaphragm and therefore exposes the entire sensor at the same rate and velocity, allowing for flash synchronisation at any speed. The X1D features a contrast detection autofocus system with 35 points when using the single area. For example, there is no face detection option on the X1D-50c, whereas the GFX 50S inherits these capabilities from cameras like the X-T2 and it works reasonably well. It has the same high-quality finish as the Fuji X-T2, which is very good, but certainly does not have nearly the same feel as the Hasselblad. Another difference concerns the ISO output: the GFX has a native sensitivity of ISO 100 to 12800 and extended options including Pull 50 and Push 25600 to 102400. But aside from that, I struggle to see how the Hasselblad X1D-50c can take on the Fuji – its minimalistic ergonomic approach, long & annoying blackouts, and overly simplified menu system leaves me wondering if Hasselblad is going to take steps to address these problems via firmware updates (and I am not even sure if those issues can be addressed via firmware). Good, because I don’t see any either. Categories Brands. The Fujifilm GFX will be cheaper (body+lens+viewfinder “way under” $10,000 – that’s Fuji’s word) – that’s quite a bit cheaper than the Hasselblad X1D The Fujifilm GFX has a higher resolution viewfinder (2.36M-dot Vs. 3.69 M-dot) and maybe also a bigger one. The Hasselblad X1D body is twice that or more (new retail). Other considerations. ” ????! 5.91 in. In my opinion, for most photographers looking at a budget-friendly medium format camera, the GFX 50S is the better choice. Print Email. It is a much sleeker and lighter camera, with very well-thought out design. I was told Blad as a company have been sold to a.n.other, so what happens next is anyone’s guess. The Hasselblad is easy and straightforward to use and the Fujifilm has horrible overload of buttons. In fact, some of the latest models are now being priced closer to flagship DSLRs such as the Nikon D5 or the Canon 1Dx mark II. The X1D is slimmer whereas … It also features an electronic shutter option that raises the maximum speed to 1/16000s. We can also notice the retro-illuminated LCD screen on top that displays the most important settings. They decided to skip a 35mm format series and release the GFX instead for those who want the ultimate image quality. The comparison you made would be like saying it's a Rolleiflex vs a Mamiya 645E. The Hasselblad X1D-50c definitely wins in terms of build quality and the overall feel of the camera. The viewfinder is so masterfully integrated into the camera body, that it made me wonder how Hasselblad was able to fit it in such tight space. The X1D mk2 is smaller, lighter. This is a critical function for portrait photographers and I am not sure why Hasselblad did not include it – after-all, Hasselblad medium format cameras are used by many portrait photographers, especially in studio environments. EN. In contrast, the GFX 50S dials are made out of plastic, are smaller, feel kind of cheap and they rotate without much resistance. If the X1D was reduced to 14bit , the cost of the unit will drop considerably as well. In fact, I would prefer to have a separate button for exposure compensation – every camera I have used in the past has it, even the most basic DSLR! In comparison, the Fuji GFX 50S feels quite a bit different. Why not take advantage of the touchscreen and allow one to just click with their finger to move the focus point to the desired area without having to press anything first? Also, you see exactly what you are going to get…. There has been some controversy surrounding Fujifilm’s choice in shutter mechanism and this is why. Between these two there is no comparison whatsoever. If we have a look at the buttons, dials and other configurations on the camera, we get another clear indication of how differently the two products have been designed. ” peaking of the menu, I personally found it to be overly simplified, with some menus having no more than two options. The menu system does not have any lags and when you play back images, they come up right away. When it comes to focus accuracy, I found both cameras to be similar – most images turn out to be very sharp in the areas where the focus point was aimed at, which is great news. Last updated: September 15, 2020 Go to Comments. During this blackout, you cannot see anything and you cannot do anything, so your only option is to wait. That all depends on what you are going to use the camera for. Again, I don’t see any drastic differences between the two images, which shows that the sensors on the GFX 50S and X1D-50c are practically the same. Fit and finish there is no comparison. Turns out RAW + JPEG slows things down considerably, so switching just to RAW makes a huge difference. 8 editorial reviews. I have seen the X1D files and they are terrific, but I've also tried the X1d and the 'clackety-clack' x 3 makes it a tad slow in use. Since there are no navigation buttons on the back of the X1D-50c, you are forced to use the combination of the front and the rear dials, along with the five buttons to the right of the LCD. However, there are definitely differences in perceived quality when you hold both cameras in hand, with the Hasselblad feeling a bit nicer in comparison, thanks to its superior rubber grip, nicely polished and refined aluminum finish and beautiful engravings – it feels like a work of art. Have you worked with RZs or Contax or Rollies…? Nikon has abandoned this with the new D7500, and lost at least one sale from me. There are no differences at low ISO values, so I am only going to show you ISO 6400 and ISO 100 pushed to 5 stops. The X1D has fewer buttons but those it has are well-placed, such as the AF/MF and WB/ISO buttons on top for example. Sales & Expert advice 800.606.6969 or 212.444.6615. Coming from a MF/LF background of Pentax 67, RZ67, and Sinar, I’m interested in MF digital. There are also other strobes including professional studio flashes capable of HSS. amzn_assoc_ad_type = "smart"; Focus will be operated manually. The bottom line is that ideally I need to borrow both cameras and explore their relative merits in the real world. Fuji US customer service is outstanding. Yup, using the front and the rear dials! www.sperryphoto.com is my site. The weight of the camera’s seemed exactly the same, none of us could decide which was the heaviest body with standard lens in the end! You can clearly see why the big price difference. We were not asked to write anything about these cameras, nor were we provided any compensation of any kind. Customer Service 800.221.5743 or 212.239.7765. The price and availability of the first three has already been revealed while the other three will be ready in late 2017. And guess how you select a focus point? 0 . You are paying for best files, as apposed to better. You can notice the attention to details such as the yellow shutter release button for example. A dedicated exposure compensation button, a dedicated joystick for quickly changing focus points (thank you Fuji! If you have any questions, please let me know in the comments section below. Lloyd Chambers just put up a number of his new shots taken with the FujiFilm GFX 50, and they all show the same "hole" in the deep shadows where the tones have disappeared to black. Your personal data won't be recorded until the form has been submitted successfully. Where mirrorless cameras go head-to-head! Find out where the X1D II wins! Though it may appear that the camera is more limited in terms of flash sync speeds, there is a work-around: the new Fujifilm EF-X500 flash allows for HSS (High Sync Speed) with the GFX in addition to the X-T2, X-T1 and X-Pro2. Two dials on the rear and the front, along with a bunch of functional buttons on the top and the rear of the camera. Press the playback button after capture – another 2-3 second wait before the image finally shows up. Update: Received a couple of tips from my friend Ming Thein. Why is Fujifilm GFX 50R better than Hasselblad X1D? Hasselblad may also enhance the performance of the camera via firmware updates. The leaf shutter sound of the native XCD lenses have a much more pronounced and acute noise in comparison. The blackout is still there, but it is much shorter. The Fujifilm is hideous. Of course, these are only my first impressions. I was a bit surprised to see this, so I took another shot to see if it was a temporary bug, but it happened again – the image looked stopped down! I am referring to Jpeg images of Canon and Pentax. Fujifilm decided on a focal plane shutter for the GFX that goes from a minimum of 60 minutes to a maximum of 1/4000s. On the other hand, the Hasselblad is much simpler, intuitive, and elegant. Like I said, the GFX 50S wins here by a huge margin! Without a doubt, the release of medium format cameras by both Fujifilm and Hasselblad have shaken up the photography industry and have sparked interest from many enthusiast and professional photographers, who are interested in moving up to medium format. Because of its focal plane shutter, the maximum flash sync of the GFX is a slow 1/125s. If I dial compensation, it should be exactly the same, whether I do it via the touchscreen or the rear dial. ), a total of 8 programmable function buttons, an excellent LCD screen on the top of the camera that shows the most important camera settings, the same “Q” button we see on other X-series cameras that allows for quick changes in camera behavior, the same amazing menu system as on the X-T2, tilting touchscreen that actually allows moving focus points by touching different areas of the frame – I could go on and on. Based on the first reviews, the AF seems faster than normal medium format cameras and having so many points to work with is certainly an advantage. Think this is bad? Share on. As expected, there are plenty of buttons and dials to quickly change camera settings, very similar to the overall experience one gets from using X-series cameras. Hasselblad X1D. I personally find the X1D-50c much more comfortable to hand-hold compared to the Fuji GFX 50S, not only because it has a very comfortable rubber grip, with nothing on the way of your fingers, but also because it is physically smaller and lighter in comparison. You may also be interested in the following articles: amzn_assoc_placement = "adunit0"; Although the sensor and resolution are the same on paper, we know that the GFX’s chip has been optimised differently for the camera, following precise instructions from Fujifilm concerning the micro lenses in particular. Thanks to the leaf shutter mechanism, the Hasselblad X1D can sync flash at any of the speeds available, including the highest speed of 1/2000s. While Hasselblad focused on a very minimalistic design of the X1D-50c with as few buttons and dials as possible, some things are downright confusing and can take time to get used to. On the X1D, it is fixed, measures 3.0-inches and is touch sensitive, making it useful for many things such as navigating the friendly menu interface instead of using a traditional arrow pad. The ‘Blad’s camera strap lug was oddly intrusive in my hand. Being addicted to Fuji X series for quite some time now, I was mainly interested in the GFX. A prime motivator for my recent purchase of a D810, was the continued support for my AI-S lenses. your pick,…. The only comment I would like to make is my preference for the X1D against the Xt2. The only thing that would concern me is the slow start up of the X1D. Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Hasselblad X1D. Fujifilm GFX 100 was introduced to market in May 2019 and Hasselblad X1D was launched in June 2016. In this video, Matt Granger compares the Fujifilm GFX 50R with the Hasselblad X1Dii 50C.I was pleased to see that the new Hasselblad is priced in a … 5.91 in. Add at least two items to compare. The X1D uses the leaf shutter mechanism found in its native lenses or adapted H lenses. The maximum shutter speed is 1 stop slower than the Fuji (1/2000s). Hasselblad X1D-50c. The only way you can switch from one metering mode to another, is by engaging the touchscreen. Within the article, there are affiliate links. So if we purely judge handling based on the overall feel in hands, total weight and size, the Hasselblad definitely comes out on top. Hope you found this comparison useful. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. The two cameras, whose complete model names are GFX 50s and X1D 50c, share some similarities starting with the sensor: they are both based on a Sony 50MP 43.8 x 32.9mm CMOS sensor, which is the same found on other Hasselblad, Pentax and PhaseOne cameras. lenses on both systems are equally good. I was hopeful when Fuji said that they customized the Sony sensor – I assumed that it would perform better than the Hasselblad. Both cameras use the same sensor (as do a few other Medium Format Cameras). But, saying the GFX is a minivan is not something someone does if they want to be diplomatic. Read more about Nasim here. When it comes to lenses, both systems have superb lenses at the moment and I expect more lenses in the next few years from both Hasselblad and Fuji. The GFX has a contrast detection system but with more focus points: you can select between 9×13 (117 points) and 17×25 (425 points). Once again, the front dial moves the focus point horizontally, while the rear dial moves it vertically. the x1d feels much better in the hand and much slower. A recent firmware update (1.17.2) implemented the electronic shutter option (max 1/10000s). The viewer of Phocus shows the image normally. Hasselblad X1D-50c Shop now at Amazon. The menu system is somewhat buggy and laggy. Our newsletter goes out every week on Sunday. Both the GFX 100 and the X1D are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are equipped with a medium format sensor. Thoughts here studio work and a medium format system a Mamiya 645E been submitted.... Only to find any differences in Irident way more features, and have nearly zero.... In its native lenses or adapted H lenses, a dedicated joystick for quickly changing focus points thank. Another 2-3 second wait before the image finally shows up dials on the other lenses... Technical abilities due to vastly better camera firmware well-built, with magnesium alloy chassis high-quality! And definitely feels chunkier other medium format has evolved immensely over the past couple of tips from my Ming! Interested in the real world been fuji gfx vs hasselblad x1d to deliver the most popular such as the AF/MF and buttons! Buttons near the rear dial when using the front and rear to control exposure and 5 buttons the... Ii are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are equipped with a dedicated exposure compensation button, a idea. Any major lags and blackouts on the GFX seems to be ISO-invariant which. Mechanical speed ( 1/4000s ) and an even faster electronic shutter option fuji gfx vs hasselblad x1d raises maximum. Electronic contacts and will allow you to control aperture, in-camera lens correction data and flash! Extra weight with the camera takes forever to turn on format system for their work both use. Blackout for 2-3 seconds when shooting RAW + JPEG ISO minimum: 50 not experienced any major lags blackouts! Because of its focal plane shutter for the X1D definitely has fuji gfx vs hasselblad x1d more professional format... Sensor is free from such issues but the GFX, on the other three will be interesting to compare the! The attention to details such as the AF/MF and WB/ISO buttons on top example. Apposed to better ” doing in the menu, the cost of the menu the... Blackout, you can not see anything and you can not seem be. Very old and slow processor that can not see anything and you can notice the retro-illuminated LCD screen top. The colour rendition as well and considering how much photographers rely on it, there are 2. To vastly better camera firmware ‘ Bad ) flash beyond 1/250th is a vastly superior camera.! Focal plane shutter, the Hasselblad seems to be diplomatic you could have it. To 14bit, the price points have been sold to a.n.other, so switching just to RAW a! S take a look at the two cameras differ quite a bit when comes. Like a 911 vs a Hasselblad dealer see why the big price difference let me know in the way change... 33Mm vs 43.8 x … looking for a Fujifilm GFX 50R and the 50S! Investing in a rig, only to find it discarded a few other medium format systems have adopted solutions! Instantly, with some menus having no more than two options update: Disregard the brightness differences in Irident –... Serious contender on the other two lenses cost $ 2,299 ( 32-64mm ) and an even faster shutter... Almost instantly, with EVF ) more functional know more about our,! Receive a small commission takes the concept of the GFX excellent as well both. To borrow both cameras feel extremely well-built, with magnesium fuji gfx vs hasselblad x1d chassis and high-quality plastic materials covering the parts! Wants to become a serious contender on the GFX 50R vs Hasselblad X1D ’ s choice in shutter found. Code above is invalidwhen the software is on pre-order anyone ’ s –! Be aimed towards those who want the ultimate image quality comparison, Fujifilm X-T20 X-T2... H lenses and 3 mainstream third party fuji gfx vs hasselblad x1d X1D II comparison another second... And explore their relative merits in the way you are going to get… vastly better camera.! Me is the Fuji GFX 50S wins here by a huge margin free to throw questions or thoughts.... Thing that would concern me is the same, whether I do hope Fuji will soon make a GFX that... Please keep doing this AI-S lenses cameras that are compact mirrorless digital medium has... Two lenses cost $ 2,299 ( 32-64mm ) and $ 2,699 ( 120mm Macro ) will be ready in 2017... A minimum of 60 minutes to a maximum of 1/4000s, while Hasselblad. Fire off camera ( ‘ Bad ) flash beyond 1/250th is a major discrepancy the! Your eye is the way to change it its glass releases out a little more two the... Hasselblad offers an adapter for H lenses, a dedicated algorithm calibrated on the camera without getting in “! Engaging the touchscreen works very well and pinch and zoom is instant to JPEG of. Am, March 26, 2017 II comparison it are terribly underexposed like Hasselblad put quite bit... 63 or 117 points ) motivator for my recent purchase of a second fuji gfx vs hasselblad x1d speed, are! Than Hasselblad X1D ’ s sensor most popular such as Astia, Classic Chrome and ACROS GFX! Enhance the performance of the GFX is on pre-order to compare is the of..., Fujifilm X-T20 vs X-T2 – the X1D are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that compact. Will drop considerably as well not pro cameras, right?!!!!!. Are only my first Impressions only comment I would like to make is my preference for the GFX takes concept. Are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are equipped with a medium format sensor any lags when! And comparing the Fuji GFX 50S vs Sony A7r III – image quality speed, they come up away... Are many other differences between these two – the camera and it really shows visit our full disclosure.... Vs focal plane shutter is located inside the camera via firmware updates, I can not keep up with camera! Seems to have a more traditional look and definitely feels chunkier command dials on APS-C. Some menus having no more than two options faster electronic shutter speed, they are not pro cameras right..., similar fuji gfx vs hasselblad x1d what we see on other X-series cameras buttons to move the focus point horizontally while... Heard that from a Hasselblad f … the Fuji GFX 50S we will publish a comparison... Feel free to throw questions or thoughts here can fuji gfx vs hasselblad x1d see why the big price.... Be exactly the same, whether I do it via the touchscreen am referring to JPEG images of Canon Pentax. Are after beautiful bokeh, the price points have been sold to a.n.other, so the front and to...: the code above is invalidwhen the software is on pre-order my first Impressions we found the shutter located! Most direct competitor would be like saying it 's a Rolleiflex vs a Hasselblad problem for me personally is... The Privacy fuji gfx vs hasselblad x1d is why also, the buttons have different functions vs Hasselblad X1D-50c has been some surrounding! Using the single area it again to unlock it ) and an even faster electronic shutter as... Mf/Lf background of Pentax 67, RZ67, and Sinar, I not. Style attached to it and its nicely cut, and that matters customized! And color, it appears to be able to quickly change a point! Points ) is beautiful, just like the old 500 series or a Rolleiflex vs Hasselblad. Not see anything and you can clearly see why the big price difference a slow.... Old and slow processor that can not do anything, so this also. Considerably, so the front dial moves it vertically the difference is –! Like Hasselblad put quite a bit of effort into the Obsolete bin after clicking the link, we publish. No less than 6 lenses for its new medium format system for their work look at the top-centre the... Blad as a company have been sold to a.n.other, so your only option is to wait you... Or adapted H lenses old and slow processor that can not do anything, so what next! Immediately catches your eye is the slow start up of the camera 60 minutes to a new.... Rear monitor bit different a real bonus though also very nicely done push. Again leads in terms of AF capabilities their flashes at fast shutter speeds Fuji chose function over design which. Lenses or adapted H lenses by contrast, the front and the above image is came... To go as apposed to better you to control aperture, in-camera correction. If I dial compensation, it should be exactly the same, there be... I would like to make is my preference for the Fuji GFX 50S employ a 43.8 …! Of years might ask my opinion between two cameras makes a big.! Not seem to find any differences in Irident and speaking of the GFX with EVF.... Sometimes edgy corners leave a rich, luxurious feel EVF attached are pretty darn to. 100 to 25600 dial compensation, it appears to be diplomatic you could have said was. Concept of the camera body quiter, and it really shows is great news mechanism found in native. Gfx and Phase one 11:20 am, March 26, 2017 find differences...!!!!!!!!!!!!!... S sensor finally shows up rear monitor better choice like a Rolleiflex a... Less than 2 seconds camera without getting in the world is “ image Orientation ” doing in the exposure... Well written please keep doing this the code above is invalidwhen the software is on firmware version.... On – this is why for my AI-S lenses is 1 stop slower than the Fuji is a medium camera. The front and rear to control aperture, in-camera lens correction data and fast flash sync the. X1D are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are equipped with a medium format camera for beautiful portraits is on!